日常生活
遏制 LLM 确认偏误的波普尔证伪提示词
I built a Popperian Falsification Prompt to stop LLM confirmation bias (Testing your plans against plausible black swans)
从风险审计和波普尔哲学的角度检验计划或假设，输出恰好3个现实可行的黑天鹅失败场景、逻辑变得不可持续的精确阈值，以及在极端情况下应用该规则所产生的矛盾。适合在执行计划前进行压力测试，并最终给出 RESISTENT 或 FALSIFIED 判定。
- 测试模型:
- GPT-4o
- 有效性评分:
- 90/100
- 提示词归档
中文版本
Act as a Risk Auditor and Popperian Philosopher. I am going to present the following hypothesis, operational plan, or technical decision: >>> [INSERT YOUR PLAN OR PROCESS HERE WITH AT LEAST 3 REAL CONTEXTUAL DATA POINTS] <<< Your goal is NOT to validate this proposal, congratulate the approach, or seek consensus. Your sole objective is to subject the premise to a critical stress test under the following 3 strict constraints: 1. PLAUSIBLE BLACK SWANS: Identify exactly 3 real-world failure scenarios (not sci-fi; based on verifiable physical, economic, human, or operational limits) where this idea completely collapses. 2. VARIABLE BREAKING POINT: Define the precise threshold (scale, time, cost, error margin, or capacity) where the logic of this plan becomes unsustainable. 3. REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM: Apply the core rule of this plan in a boundary/extreme case and demonstrate the contradiction or unintended adverse effect it creates. OUTPUT RULES: - If the plan survives all 3 filters with minor tweaks, declare it: "RESISTENT". - If the plan requires rebuilding the core premise, declare it: "FALSIFIED" and ePlaintextAct as a Risk Auditor and Popperian Philosopher. I am going to present the following hypothesis, operational plan, or technical decision: >>> [INSERT YOUR PLAN OR PROCESS HERE WITH AT LEAST 3 REAL CONTEXTUAL DATA POINTS] <<< Your goal is NOT to validate this proposal, congratulate the approach, or seek consensus. Your sole objective is to subject the premise to a critical stress test under the following 3 strict constraints: 1. PLAUSIBLE BLACK SWANS: Identify exactly 3 real-world failure scenarios (not sci-fi; based on verifiable physical, economic, human, or operational limits) where this idea completely collapses. 2. VARIABLE BREAKING POINT: Define the precise threshold (scale, time, cost, error margin, or capacity) where the logic of this plan becomes unsustainable. 3. REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM: Apply the core rule of this plan in a boundary/extreme case and demonstrate the contradiction or unintended adverse effect it creates. OUTPUT RULES: - If the plan survives all 3 filters with minor tweaks, declare it: "RESISTENT". - If the plan requires rebuilding the core premise, declare it: "FALSIFIED" and explain the structural failure.
填入内容并运行
- 在 ChatGPT 中打开 （在新标签页中打开）
- 在 Claude 中打开 （在新标签页中打开）
- 在 Gemini 中打开 （在新标签页中打开）
Gemini 无法通过链接接收提示词，请先复制。
- 在 Perplexity 中打开 （在新标签页中打开）
将在新标签页打开并已填入提示词。可能需要先登录该服务。
如何使用此提示词
- 发送前，请将方括号中的内容替换为你自己的信息。
- 不同模型的结果会有差异。若输出不理想，可换一个模型或补充一个具体示例。
- 请将提示词放在一条消息中发送。分多次发送会削弱指令效果。
