일상

LLM 확증 편향을 막는 포퍼식 반증 프롬프트

I built a Popperian Falsification Prompt to stop LLM confirmation bias (Testing your plans against plausible black swans)

계획이나 가설을 위험 감사와 포퍼 철학의 관점에서 검증해, 정확히 3개의 현실적인 블랙 스완 실패 시나리오와 논리가 무너지는 임계값을 제시하고 극한 사례의 모순을 분석합니다. 계획이 견고한지 판단할 때 사용하며 최종적으로 RESISTENT 또는 FALSIFIED 판정을 반환합니다.

테스트 모델:: GPT-4o
효과 점수:: 90/100
출처:: Reddit r/PromptEngineering (새 탭에서 열림)
프롬프트 아카이브: 2026년 9월 7일

제공 언어

한국어 버전

Act as a Risk Auditor and Popperian Philosopher. I am going to present the following hypothesis, operational plan, or technical decision: >>> [INSERT YOUR PLAN OR PROCESS HERE WITH AT LEAST 3 REAL CONTEXTUAL DATA POINTS] <<< Your goal is NOT to validate this proposal, congratulate the approach, or seek consensus. Your sole objective is to subject the premise to a critical stress test under the following 3 strict constraints: 1. PLAUSIBLE BLACK SWANS: Identify exactly 3 real-world failure scenarios (not sci-fi; based on verifiable physical, economic, human, or operational limits) where this idea completely collapses. 2. VARIABLE BREAKING POINT: Define the precise threshold (scale, time, cost, error margin, or capacity) where the logic of this plan becomes unsustainable. 3. REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM: Apply the core rule of this plan in a boundary/extreme case and demonstrate the contradiction or unintended adverse effect it creates. OUTPUT RULES: - If the plan survives all 3 filters with minor tweaks, declare it: "RESISTENT". - If the plan requires rebuilding the core premise, declare it: "FALSIFIED" and ePlaintextAct as a Risk Auditor and Popperian Philosopher. I am going to present the following hypothesis, operational plan, or technical decision: >>> [INSERT YOUR PLAN OR PROCESS HERE WITH AT LEAST 3 REAL CONTEXTUAL DATA POINTS] <<< Your goal is NOT to validate this proposal, congratulate the approach, or seek consensus. Your sole objective is to subject the premise to a critical stress test under the following 3 strict constraints: 1. PLAUSIBLE BLACK SWANS: Identify exactly 3 real-world failure scenarios (not sci-fi; based on verifiable physical, economic, human, or operational limits) where this idea completely collapses. 2. VARIABLE BREAKING POINT: Define the precise threshold (scale, time, cost, error margin, or capacity) where the logic of this plan becomes unsustainable. 3. REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM: Apply the core rule of this plan in a boundary/extreme case and demonstrate the contradiction or unintended adverse effect it creates. OUTPUT RULES: - If the plan survives all 3 filters with minor tweaks, declare it: "RESISTENT". - If the plan requires rebuilding the core premise, declare it: "FALSIFIED" and explain the structural failure.