코딩
악마의 변론자
devil adv
주장의 핵심을 파악하고 원래 입장이 옳은 점을 인정한 뒤, 근거와 논리를 갖춘 2~3개의 반론을 구성합니다. 상대 주장의 전제와 예상되는 재반박까지 검토해야 할 때 사용하세요.
- 테스트 모델:
- GPT-4o
- 효과 점수:
- 95/100
- 프롬프트 아카이브
한국어 버전
Objective: Construct a compelling counter-argument
1. **Identify the central point of the content**
* Find the core idea or main argument
* Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
* Reflect on the "why?" of the content
* Note the scope and limitations of the content
2. **Identify the counter-position**
* Determine what a thoughtful critic would argue
* Find the strongest objections you can
* Identify shared ground and points of departure
3. **Show genuine understanding**
* Start by stating what the original argument gets right
* Identify valid concerns the original argument addresses
* Demonstrate respect for the position you're arguing against
4. **Build a strong opposing case**
* Present 2-3 compelling counter-points with reasoning
* Use evidence and logic, not emotion or dismissal
* Anticipate and address likely rebuttals
5. **Explain the fundamental disagreement**
* Identify the key assumption or value difference
* Show why reasonable people might disagree
* Avoid straw-man fallacy or bad-faith interpretation
6. **Handling exceptions**
Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
* respond as best you can and
* acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
7. **Final response**
If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
* Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
* Favor simple sentences that use common words
**Format the response as:**
**The original position:** ${one_sentence_summary_of_what_the_page_argues}
**What this gets right:** ${genuine_acknowledgment_of_valid_points}
**A counter argument**
1. [Counter-point with reasoning]
2. [Counter-point with reasoning]
3. [Counter-point with reasoning]
**The core disagreement:** ${explanation_of_the_underlying_value_or_assumption_difference}
8. **Follow-up questions**
If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.값을 채워 바로 실행
이 프롬프트에는 채울 곳이 4군데 있습니다. 값을 넣으면 완성된 프롬프트를 만들어 드립니다.
4군데 남음
완성된 프롬프트
Objective: Construct a compelling counter-argument
1. **Identify the central point of the content**
* Find the core idea or main argument
* Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
* Reflect on the "why?" of the content
* Note the scope and limitations of the content
2. **Identify the counter-position**
* Determine what a thoughtful critic would argue
* Find the strongest objections you can
* Identify shared ground and points of departure
3. **Show genuine understanding**
* Start by stating what the original argument gets right
* Identify valid concerns the original argument addresses
* Demonstrate respect for the position you're arguing against
4. **Build a strong opposing case**
* Present 2-3 compelling counter-points with reasoning
* Use evidence and logic, not emotion or dismissal
* Anticipate and address likely rebuttals
5. **Explain the fundamental disagreement**
* Identify the key assumption or value difference
* Show why reasonable people might disagree
* Avoid straw-man fallacy or bad-faith interpretation
6. **Handling exceptions**
Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
* respond as best you can and
* acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
7. **Final response**
If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
* Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
* Favor simple sentences that use common words
**Format the response as:**
**The original position:** ${one_sentence_summary_of_what_the_page_argues}
**What this gets right:** ${genuine_acknowledgment_of_valid_points}
**A counter argument**
1. [Counter-point with reasoning]
2. [Counter-point with reasoning]
3. [Counter-point with reasoning]
**The core disagreement:** ${explanation_of_the_underlying_value_or_assumption_difference}
8. **Follow-up questions**
If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.- ChatGPT에서 열기 (새 탭에서 열림)
- Claude에서 열기 (새 탭에서 열림)
- Gemini에서 열기 (새 탭에서 열림)
Gemini는 링크로 프롬프트를 전달할 수 없어, 먼저 복사해 주세요.
- Perplexity에서 열기 (새 탭에서 열림)
새 탭이 열리고 프롬프트가 미리 입력됩니다. 서비스에 로그인되어 있어야 할 수 있습니다.
이 프롬프트 사용법
- 대괄호로 표시된 부분을 여러분의 내용으로 바꿔서 입력하세요.
- 모델에 따라 결과가 달라집니다. 원하는 답이 아니면 다른 모델을 쓰거나 구체적인 예시를 하나 덧붙이세요.
- 프롬프트는 한 번에 하나의 메시지로 보내세요. 여러 번에 나누면 지시가 약해집니다.