본문으로 건너뛰기
PromptDaily매일 큐레이션·검증되는 AI 프롬프트
이미지 생성

엉킨 문서를 슬라이드당 한 가지 아이디어의 개요로 바꾸기

Copy-paste this prompt to turn a messy doc into a clean, one-idea-per-slide outline

엉킨 문서의 핵심 주장을 추려 4~7장의 프레젠테이션 개요로 재구성하며, 각 슬라이드에 단정적인 헤드라인과 이를 뒷받침하는 2~3개의 불릿을 제공합니다. 문서의 순서를 그대로 옮기지 않고 명확한 슬라이드 덱으로 다시 설계할 때 사용하세요.

테스트 모델:
GPT-4o
효과 점수:
90/100
프롬프트 아카이브

한국어 버전

```
 I'm pasting a document below. Turn it into a presentation outline. 
 
Do NOT follow the document's order or headings. Rebuild from first principles:
 1. Read the whole thing and identify the single core argument.
 2. Identify the 4-7 points that argument actually needs. Discard everything else, even if it's interesting.
 3. Sequence those points so each one sets up the next. 
 
For each point, output:
 - Slide headline: the takeaway as a full assertive sentence
 - 2-3 bullets: only the evidence that supports THAT headline 
 
Cut anything that's context, throat-clearing, or repetition. If the doc says the same thing three ways, keep the clearest one. 
 
DOCUMENT:
 [paste]
 ``` 
 
Why it works: the failure mode with document-to-slides is "shadow-mirroring", where the model copies the source's layout instead of designing a new one. Explicitly telling it to ignore the doc's order and extract the core argument first forces a real restructure. The "discard interesting things" line matters more than it looks, because most bloated decks are bloated out of a fear of leaving stuff out. 
 
Example: I ran a 2,000-word strategy memo through this and it collapsed to six slides that actually built on each other, versus the fourteen flat slides I got asking directly. 
 
Curious if the "discard even if interesting" instruction survives for other people or if your model keeps sneaking the extra points back in.

값을 채워 바로 실행

이 프롬프트에는 채울 곳이 1군데 있습니다. 값을 넣으면 완성된 프롬프트를 만들어 드립니다.

1군데 남음

완성된 프롬프트

```
 I'm pasting a document below. Turn it into a presentation outline. 
 
Do NOT follow the document's order or headings. Rebuild from first principles:
 1. Read the whole thing and identify the single core argument.
 2. Identify the 4-7 points that argument actually needs. Discard everything else, even if it's interesting.
 3. Sequence those points so each one sets up the next. 
 
For each point, output:
 - Slide headline: the takeaway as a full assertive sentence
 - 2-3 bullets: only the evidence that supports THAT headline 
 
Cut anything that's context, throat-clearing, or repetition. If the doc says the same thing three ways, keep the clearest one. 
 
DOCUMENT:
 [paste]
 ``` 
 
Why it works: the failure mode with document-to-slides is "shadow-mirroring", where the model copies the source's layout instead of designing a new one. Explicitly telling it to ignore the doc's order and extract the core argument first forces a real restructure. The "discard interesting things" line matters more than it looks, because most bloated decks are bloated out of a fear of leaving stuff out. 
 
Example: I ran a 2,000-word strategy memo through this and it collapsed to six slides that actually built on each other, versus the fourteen flat slides I got asking directly. 
 
Curious if the "discard even if interesting" instruction survives for other people or if your model keeps sneaking the extra points back in.

새 탭이 열리고 프롬프트가 미리 입력됩니다. 서비스에 로그인되어 있어야 할 수 있습니다.

이 프롬프트 사용법

  • 대괄호로 표시된 부분을 여러분의 내용으로 바꿔서 입력하세요.
  • 모델에 따라 결과가 달라집니다. 원하는 답이 아니면 다른 모델을 쓰거나 구체적인 예시를 하나 덧붙이세요.
  • 프롬프트는 한 번에 하나의 메시지로 보내세요. 여러 번에 나누면 지시가 약해집니다.

이미지 생성 프롬프트