日常
プローブ
Probe
- テスト済みモデル:
- GPT-4o
- 有効性スコア:
- 80/100
- プロンプトアーカイブ
日本語バージョン
Objective: Generate questions that help the user think deeply about a topic
1. **Identify the central point of the content**
* Find the core idea or main argument
* Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
* Reflect on the "why?" of the content
* Note the scope and limitations of the content
* Make connections to broader topics, if possible
2. **Generate diverse question types**
* **Challenge assumptions**: What does this take for granted?
* **Explore implications**: If this is true, what follows?
* **Connect to experience**: How does this relate to life?
* **Consider alternatives**: What's the counter-argument?
* **Identify gaps**: What doesn't this answer?
3. **Favor questions that are open ended**
* No single right answer
* Invite personal reflection
* Encourage deeper exploration
4. **Handling exceptions**
Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
* respond as best you can and
* acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
5. **Final response**
If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
* Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
* Favor simple sentences that use common words
**Questions to think about**
1. **Challenge assumptions:** ${question_about_what_the_content_takes_for_granted}
2. **Explore implications:** ${question_about_what_follows_if_this_is_true}
3. **Connect to experience:** [Question relating to personal life/experience]
4. **Consider alternatives:** [Question about counter-arguments or other views]
5. **Identify gaps:** [Question about what isn't addressed]
6. **Follow-up questions**
If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.値を入れて実行
このプロンプトには5か所の空欄があります。入力すると完成版を組み立てます。
残り5か所
完成したプロンプト
Objective: Generate questions that help the user think deeply about a topic
1. **Identify the central point of the content**
* Find the core idea or main argument
* Identify what the author wants readers to believe or do
* Reflect on the "why?" of the content
* Note the scope and limitations of the content
* Make connections to broader topics, if possible
2. **Generate diverse question types**
* **Challenge assumptions**: What does this take for granted?
* **Explore implications**: If this is true, what follows?
* **Connect to experience**: How does this relate to life?
* **Consider alternatives**: What's the counter-argument?
* **Identify gaps**: What doesn't this answer?
3. **Favor questions that are open ended**
* No single right answer
* Invite personal reflection
* Encourage deeper exploration
4. **Handling exceptions**
Prioritize excellent content in your response. If you're unable to formulate a response that meets all criteria, you should
* respond as best you can and
* acknowledge any limitations or challenges you faced. For example, maybe there wasn't sufficient content on a webpage or the content wasn't compatible with a given request.
Consider your proposed response objectively and rate it on a scale from 1-10. If you wouldn't give it a 10, either try to create a stronger response or consider acknowledging any limitations or challenges you faced. The score is just for your own purposes; don't share it with the user.
5. **Final response**
If you have relevant info to share, your final response should follow standard writing guidelines, including:
* Sentence case: titles, labels, and all other content should be displayed using sentence case (only proper nouns and the first letter of a string appear capitalized).
* Favor simple sentences that use common words
**Questions to think about**
1. **Challenge assumptions:** ${question_about_what_the_content_takes_for_granted}
2. **Explore implications:** ${question_about_what_follows_if_this_is_true}
3. **Connect to experience:** [Question relating to personal life/experience]
4. **Consider alternatives:** [Question about counter-arguments or other views]
5. **Identify gaps:** [Question about what isn't addressed]
6. **Follow-up questions**
If you can think of a way you can help the user act on information shown in the response, conclude with one (at most two) sentences that offers this help. Frame it as a question so that a simple response like "yes please" might launch the next round.- ChatGPTで開く (新しいタブで開きます)
- Claudeで開く (新しいタブで開きます)
- Geminiで開く (新しいタブで開きます)
Geminiはリンクでプロンプトを渡せないため、先にコピーしてください。
- Perplexityで開く (新しいタブで開きます)
新しいタブが開き、プロンプトが入力済みの状態になります。ログインが必要な場合があります。
このプロンプトの使い方
- 角かっこで囲まれた部分を自分の内容に置き換えてから送信してください。
- モデルによって結果は変わります。期待した出力でなければ、別のモデルを試すか、具体例を1つ追加してください。
- プロンプトは1つのメッセージにまとめて送ってください。分割すると指示が弱まります。