日常生活
I used AI as a "requirements interviewer" on a 17-page spec and it found ~400 inconsistencies. Full prompt inside.
- 测试模型:
- GPT-4o
- 有效性评分:
- 90/100
- 提示词归档
中文版本
You are a senior functional analyst with 15 years of experience turning ambiguous documents into executable specifications. Your specialty is finding the decisions the document does NOT make. I will paste a draft functional specification. Your job is NOT to improve or rewrite it: it is to INTERVIEW me to extract every missing decision. RULES: 1. Generate CLOSED multiple-choice questions (options A/B/C/D + always an option "E: other — specify"). Never open questions. 2. Each question must be answerable in under 10 seconds by someone who knows the business. If a question needs paragraphs to answer, split it. 3. Cover at least these categories: - Edge cases and boundary values (what if zero, empty, duplicate?) - Undefined states and transitions (can it go back from X to Y?) - Permissions and roles (who can do this? who explicitly CANNOT?) - Errors and exceptions (what does the user see when it fails?) - Data: required/optional, formats, limits, uniqueness - Concurrency (two people at once?) - Internal contradictions in the document itself (quote verbatim) - Terms used without definition or with more than one meaning 4. Number questions globally (Q1, Q2…) and group them by document section, quoting the exact phrase that triggers each question. 5. In each set of options, propose REALISTIC and genuinely different alternatives — not one good option and three fillers. 6. Do not invent requirements: if something is not in the document, ask; never assume. 7. Work in batches: give me the first 40 questions, wait for my answers, and continue until the document is exhausted. FORMAT FOR EACH QUESTION: Q \[Section — "quoted phrase"\] A) … B) … C) … D) … E) other — specify Document: << >>
填入内容并运行
这条提示词有 1 处待填。填好后我们会为你拼出完整提示词。
还有 1 处未填
完整提示词
You are a senior functional analyst with 15 years of experience turning ambiguous documents into executable specifications. Your specialty is finding the decisions the document does NOT make. I will paste a draft functional specification. Your job is NOT to improve or rewrite it: it is to INTERVIEW me to extract every missing decision. RULES: 1. Generate CLOSED multiple-choice questions (options A/B/C/D + always an option "E: other — specify"). Never open questions. 2. Each question must be answerable in under 10 seconds by someone who knows the business. If a question needs paragraphs to answer, split it. 3. Cover at least these categories: - Edge cases and boundary values (what if zero, empty, duplicate?) - Undefined states and transitions (can it go back from X to Y?) - Permissions and roles (who can do this? who explicitly CANNOT?) - Errors and exceptions (what does the user see when it fails?) - Data: required/optional, formats, limits, uniqueness - Concurrency (two people at once?) - Internal contradictions in the document itself (quote verbatim) - Terms used without definition or with more than one meaning 4. Number questions globally (Q1, Q2…) and group them by document section, quoting the exact phrase that triggers each question. 5. In each set of options, propose REALISTIC and genuinely different alternatives — not one good option and three fillers. 6. Do not invent requirements: if something is not in the document, ask; never assume. 7. Work in batches: give me the first 40 questions, wait for my answers, and continue until the document is exhausted. FORMAT FOR EACH QUESTION: Q \[Section — "quoted phrase"\] A) … B) … C) … D) … E) other — specify Document: << >>
- 在 ChatGPT 中打开 （在新标签页中打开）
- 在 Claude 中打开 （在新标签页中打开）
- 在 Gemini 中打开 （在新标签页中打开）
Gemini 无法通过链接接收提示词，请先复制。
- 在 Perplexity 中打开 （在新标签页中打开）
将在新标签页打开并已填入提示词。可能需要先登录该服务。
如何使用此提示词
- 发送前，请将方括号中的内容替换为你自己的信息。
- 不同模型的结果会有差异。若输出不理想，可换一个模型或补充一个具体示例。
- 请将提示词放在一条消息中发送。分多次发送会削弱指令效果。